🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.