🔗 Share this article

California Governor Gavin Newsom declared this past Sunday that he is taking legal action against Donald Trump over the reported dispatch of three hundred Californian national guard troops to Oregon.

“They are on their way there now,” Newsom stated in a press statement. “This administration is openly attacking the judicial framework itself and putting into action their dangerous rhetoric – disregarding judicial rulings and considering court officials, including those named by the President, as political opponents.”

Judicial Context and National Decision

The governor's legal action comes after a federal judge’s ruling that prevented the White House from dispatching the Oregon's guard to the city of Portland. US district judge Karin Immergut supported claims that it would intensify rather than calm conflict in the city.

The judge said in her decision, which postpones sending the guard until at least October 18, that there was a insufficient proof that the ongoing rallies in the city merited the action.

Local Officials React

Portland's legal representative, the deputy attorney, said that there had been an absence of violent incidents against Ice officers for months and that current rallies were calm in the week before the chief executive labeled the city to be a battlefield, sometimes involving less than twelve demonstrators.

“Public safety is not the real concern, the core issue is control,” Governor Newsom asserted. “Legal action will be our response, but the public should speak out in the presence of such dangerous and authoritarian behavior by the nation's leader.”

State Attorney General Comments

Via a public comment on X, Oregon attorney general Dan Rayfield stated that the state is evaluating choices and preparing to take legal action.

“The President is evidently hellbent on deploying the military in U.S. urban centers, lacking proof or justification to do so,” he wrote. “The duty falls on us and the courts to demand answers. That’s what we intend to do.”

National and Local Response

The California national guard directed inquiries to the defense department. A department spokesperson declined to comment. There was no immediate comment from the executive branch.

Broader Context

This development from Oregon came just a 24 hours after Trump ordered the dispatch of military personnel to Chicago, the newest in a succession of similar actions across multiple US states.

Trump had originally declared the plan on September 27, stating he was approving maximum deployment, if necessary” in spite of appeals from Oregon officials and the representatives from the state, who reported there had been a solitary, calm rally outside a federal agency location.

Historical Context

For years, Trump has amplified the account that the city is a battle-scarred urban center with radicals involved in disorder and illegal activities.

During his first term in the year 2020, he dispatched government agents to the city in the midst of the demonstrations over the murder by law enforcement of an individual in Minneapolis. The demonstrations spread across the US but were especially heightened in Portland. Despite demonstrations against federal authorities being modest in size in the region recently, Trump has used them as a justification to send troops.

Speaking on X about the recent action from Trump, the governor commented: “This is shocking. This goes against American values, and action is needed to halt it.”